Posts Tagged ‘Advertising’

Social Media

In the old days, people relied mostly on products and services. Advertising didn’t exist back then, it was just as simple as putting a plank with your name and your occupation on your door or outside your gate. Nobody would see the plank unless they passed by your house or store. The business rule was very simple, if you have good products or services, then your happy customers will tell their friends, and if they were satisfied, then they will tell their friends and so on and so forth. Until now, we still found Word Of Mouth (WOM) marketing to be the most powerful tool every marketer should utilize. However, maintaining positive WOM is extremely difficult, since the expectation is always getting higher and higher so there has to be continuous improvement on the products’ or services’ side.

Then radio was invented and soon after, the television. Advertising as one dominant type of marketing communication became too strong. Small companies suddenly had national brands because they started selling their products in a massive way all over the country or even the world. Brand image suddenly become THE MOST important thing in marketing. Companies would do anything to defend their brands, they lied, cheated, even said negative thing about their competitors. As I have said before, they’d do anything to make their brands look good.

Then there’s the era of consumer power, where suddenly the market became so saturated with advertising, that customers became confused and started to come to their senses. They just want products that work and fit within their budget.  Marketers started panicking and scream that Advertising is Dead, Sales is Dead, etc. Of course they’re dead, advertising and sales are mostly one way communication, it’s how companies are pushing their products to the customers. Customers eventually have to make their choice based on their limited budget. The competitions then reached its peak and escalated into a price war. Who wins the war? Customers for sure, a lot of big bulk retailers that sells high volume at small margins and a few niche players.

Within the last 3 years, the social media has stolen the spotlight. Companies are flocking to use the new media to reach millions of (potential) customers. Social media specialists suddenly are in high demand. Despite all the hype, these companies keep forgetting that social media is not another type of advertising they thought they knew and will never be one.  Most companies use social media (i.e. Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) and blogs as a form of one-way communication. Although they have done a great job of making it looks interactive, they hardly read their customers’ comment, and deleted the negative comments as if there is nothing worth improving. They are creating a narcissistic “faux-brand-image” where they always look perfect and everybody’s always so happy.  Those companies do not realize that those unsatisfied customers will never go away, because they have been using their personal blogs or any other media (facebook, twitter, etc) to express their disappointment and frustration.

As for me, I am a traditional marketer who believes that everything is about innovation and continuous improvement of products and services. Advertising, updates, tweets, blogs and everything else is secondary. The best example that I can use probably is to compare Apple and RIM. Apple always come up with disruptive technologies that upset the competition, while RIM (who used to be very innovative) prefers to use its current proprietary Blackberry Messaging technology. iPad is definitely not the first tablet computer in the world, but in people’s mind, iPad is ultimate tablet computer because of its intuitive touch technology. On the other hand, despite how much money RIM had invested in product development, PlayBook will never be regarded as an innovative product, since people will always see it as just another iPad clone.

It really doesn’t matter how much budget  your company has allocated to hire the best social media specialists to exploit the potential of social media and other internet-based technology, I still believe in the power of Word of Mouth Marketing (WOM) because in the end, everything will come down to this: IF YOUR CUSTOMERS WON’T RECOMMEND YOU TO THEIR FRIENDS, THAT MEANS YOUR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES STINK! (PW)

Read Full Post »

I have read several websites that discusses about vectorized photographs.

If you like to see more vector arts, you can go to the following links:

One obvious question kept popping up: If you have the photograph, what is the need of vectorized photograph? Isn’t it just beat the purpose of having a photograph?

Here is an image that I worked on based on a photo of an old phone:



Do you notice how crisp the image is?  Here is what it looks like without the rendering:

old-phone wireframe

old-phone wireframe

Yes, now you see how painful it is to trace a photograph and put colors in each of the vertex. For a vectorized picture above, it took me about 10 hours using Gradient Mesh feature of Adobe Illustrator CS3.

Now let’s talk about why people convert a photograph into a vectorized image like the above. There are several reason why vectoring photographs is the best solution, such as:

  1. If the photograph is not superior in terms of contrast, sharpness and resolution, a vectorized traced image will eliminate all these problems.
  2. Even if the photograph is very clear and has a high resolution,  sometimes you will still be able to see ‘dusts’ that were captured by the camera, a vectorized traced image will also eliminate this problem (Photoshop editing might also do the trick).
  3. Even if the photograph is flawless and has a high resolution, there will still be limitation on how big you can reprint it. If you’re printing a photograph to a size of a billboard, then of course, you will see the image breaking or the noises will become visible. Vectorized Image will not break up, no matter how big you want to print it and since it is not bitmap-base, it will remain crisp and sharp.

The process, like I have mentioned before,  is quite painful, since you have to trace every detail in a very precise manner. The more details you included in the effort, the more realistic the result will be, but on the downside, much more time will be needed to finish it.

For me, vectorizing images of photographs are not 100% art, but more an exercise in patience, It is though,  a printing solution, which in some cases are necessary to produce high quality images for printed media. I have a feeling, in the future, it would be done by a software, with a just few click of a button. (PW)

Read Full Post »

As a graphic designers who has tons of deadlines to meet, sometimes we are faced with limited resources, including images that we are going to use for the artwork. Using stock photographs is one solution that can be considered. However, we also have to realize that we might not find the perfect photo, which means that we have to do a little ‘magic’ with Photoshop in order to make it work.

The city of Toronto is quite notorious for its Photoshop works. The cover of Toronto Fun Guide says it all.


Toronto Fun Guide Before & After

In the image above, not only the proportion is off, the hue and lighting are off too. Take a close look at the finger tip on the left side of the image. Looking at the original picture (left), I believe those fingers belong to the mother, and in the engineered picture, the fingers were darkened to suggest they now belong to the father, and this makes it even funnier, since the father’s arm must be very long. In addition to those silliness, the cropping against the blue background is terrible.

If you want to read the entire article, you can go to http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/toronto/archive/2009/06/10/city-digitally-adds-black-guy-to-fun-guide-cover-to-make-it-more-inclusive.aspx

I took a subway train yesterday, and I saw another ad, this time by Toronto Public Health, and it really bothers me because of some technical and non-technical issues. (I thought the lady in the picture is too confident, she should have been more sad, but let’s leave the conceptual side later).

Here is the original image:

Original Ad

Original Ad

Using my common sense first of all, I can see that the hand is a montage. If I use the face as a basic of my analysis, I would say, that the woman in the picture is about 16 years old, and most likely on the slim side. When you look at the chubby hand, they just don’t fit. Not to mention the different in hue between the hand and the face, the hand got more exposure to hard light than the face.

When you try to find the source of light, you will see that the direction of light for the hand and the face is also different. Not to mention that there are no shadows on the paper at all.



If I did this image, I probably would look for a hand that is more petite and have similar hues and shading to the face. However, just to show you my point, let me try to fix it, even though it’s not going to be perfect, because I would need a hi-res images to get it right.

  1. First of all, I made the hand ‘thinner’ and ‘slimmer’ to match the face.
  2. Then I made the hand less bright and add more ‘red’ and ‘yellow’ to the color balance to match the hue
  3. I even added some shadows on the bottom side of the hand (not too much)
  4. Then I worked on the paper by adding some shades to the paper using filter and drew the hand’s shadow on it with around 65% opacity

Here is the result:

Corrected Image

Corrected Image

Now I believe it is much better. (PW)

Read Full Post »